Footwear Design
Of course, the science of sport shoe design is far from accurate. For Inst
TION, the current emphasis is on foot pronation clients. Other possible causes
Injuries, such as foot, ankle, knee and hip movements in three dimensions
largely ignored. In addition, footwear design is based almost exclusively on
theoretical models postulate that the load, and the fact that
Human Anatomy in the process of adapting to this pollution are the main reasons for the performance
Injuries. This follows from the information provided by the manufacturer that their
Excessive pronation shoes right to regain control of the hindfoot, offer
Upper arch support or the hardening effect. These shoes do not change
impact during locomotion, serious doubts about the
Attenuation of the philosophy that the foundation for all the footwear design.
Studies Robbins et al (1988) showed that only one in the leg nude
demonstrates the strong plantar surface of the reaction
Planting in soil in relation to the load and the risk of damage
Overloading during locomotion. Their work also showed that this response
There was no clear distinction between the subjects who always wear shoes, especially at very
Shocks shoes worn in the drivers as a whole. They concluded that
Protective responses in order to prevent injuries by reducing the rigidity of the system,
Reducing the maximum impact force in the leg. Lack of protection
The reaction of users in the shoes, apparently because of reduced plantar sensory
Information, possibly in conjunction with mechanical intervention in the arch strain
through the laces, heel counters and arch support (Robbins et al, 1988). It
it seems that a movement without shoes
daily to the sensitivity of plantar reflex camera protection
and that less attention should be focused on the development of passive
Shocks or changes in pronation shoes.
Little has been done on the lower limb injuries in conjunction with anthropometric
Factors such as bodymass, height or length of limbs or other factors, including
The level of skill, intensity of movement, distribution of muscle fibers,
EMG activity of the structures, processes, feedback, or bone density. No studies
examined aerobic or cross training shoes with the degree
The severity and not entirely satisfactory, in three dimensions
Studies on physical factors that influence the efficiency of the whole body
The movement from start to finish action on the locomotor system, especially
on the optimal design of each shoe.
Regardless of how well the shoes to the proper use of
different movements. The user should bear in mind that if the shoes
proprioceptive and tactile sensitivity to the surface on which
used.
Another consideration is also worthy of attention. Force shoes are
Delays in the transfer because of its unique shock-absorbing path
Foot. Given the positive response of support (see 3.5.3), which usually
works very well in bare feet too strong reflection of the expansion
in the legs and body for rapid stabilization of the delay
cybernetic control and correction of dangerous movements when it is loaded.
In particular, the use of the site pre-mission to the surface in
Only the legs, the position of the party
(Guyton, 1984), so that the geometry of the shoe may not be enough
Changes in the structure of a set of muscles of lower limbs.
In contrast, the use of bare feet on a very high-density chip foam mats
middle-class fitness stores proprioceptive efficiency, reduce
The center of gravity of the body, and, unlike shoes, not to increase the leverage
Arm length of the coordinator of the heel to ankle joint, so
Reduced moments of violence in all joints of the lower extremities.